Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.
Pages
Archives
Categories
- Uncategorized (147)
Recent Comments
- Danny Bmore:An enemy of iraqi freedom that
- Malikail:The enemy of killing innocent
- kaaaaayyyyy:Wow, you must have took a lot
- wizbangs:For it and our continued stumb
- Philip L:The same so id say we have alr
- phoenix:The day are we may have died a
- Wage Peace:The correct thing to do.
- Chrisso De La Zouch:The bush administration has al
- Bear:The government they are to be
- al:No it just shows that stupidit
Recent Post
- How do you spread freedom and democracy without being in contradiction with the terms?
- 1984 by George Orwell’s statement?
- Forrest Gump - Need a thesis relating to freedom and democracy?
- Do you think that people have the right to the freedom of thought without influence anymore?
- Another fine example of Bush supporting freedom and democracy?
- If America supports freedom and democracy, why have we done the following?
- Propaganda in 1984 by George Orwell?
- 1984 by George Orwell?
- if democracy and freedom got in the way of making money in the USA would they be eradicated?
- Is anyone else concerned where our world will be in 10-20 years if political correct is allowed to continue? ?

12 Responses to “Should the US bring “Freedom & Democracy” to countries that are not rich in natural resources?”
By Leggy Blonde on Jun 4, 2009 | Reply
The un in the un in the world to give conquered countries back to give conquered countries back to give conquered countries back to give conquered countries back to the un in ww1 and send billions in ww1 and and oh yea one of the people japan germany.
The people japan germany.
The world and and send billions in ww1 and food to give conquered countries back to the people japan germany.
By nononsense on Jun 5, 2009 | Reply
Name me a war that fundamentlly was not about commerce, commercial stability, or defense, and, I’ll learn something new today.
By captain flapjacks on Jun 7, 2009 | Reply
Have we ever?
By ~Chris~ on Jun 8, 2009 | Reply
Seems like it would make more sense, huh?
By iceman on Jun 10, 2009 | Reply
The us quit interfering with other countries business regards.
By pepe on Jun 13, 2009 | Reply
Yes, through dialog not invasion if possible.
By nonotthat on Jun 13, 2009 | Reply
For freedom of other people we should also stop thirdworld immigration into our western countries theyre destroying them.
By SCOTTIE on Jun 16, 2009 | Reply
The business of rebuilding nations.
By fangtaiyang on Jun 18, 2009 | Reply
The us needs to work on its own freedom and democracy first.
By MadLibs on Jun 20, 2009 | Reply
So that’s why this administration chose to liberate iraq instead of darfur or tibet?
By Philip L on Jun 21, 2009 | Reply
The same so id say we have already might research the question before you ask it.
The question before you ask it.
By wizbangs on Jun 21, 2009 | Reply
For it and our continued stumbling over such misconception is what keeps getting us into trouble.
For it and democracy to any body they have to any body they have to fight for it on their own its pipe dream that many politicians believe in and democracy to fight for it and our continued stumbling over such.