Does anyone else feel Bush has no real interest in freedom?
November 5th, 2008 | by admin |
terripinstn asked:
Our president claims he wants to spread democracy. Why then does he ignore China’s grievous human rights practices. Thousands of Tibeten slaughtered and banished from their home and America does nothing. I realize we cannot fix the worlds problems but it is hipocritical to ignore certain ones to keep money flowing into our president’s corporate cronies’ pockets. Not to mention the freedom and privacy we lost in the name of anti-terrorism. If we lose our rights and our president becomes a dictator don’t the terrorists win?
Peter
Our president claims he wants to spread democracy. Why then does he ignore China’s grievous human rights practices. Thousands of Tibeten slaughtered and banished from their home and America does nothing. I realize we cannot fix the worlds problems but it is hipocritical to ignore certain ones to keep money flowing into our president’s corporate cronies’ pockets. Not to mention the freedom and privacy we lost in the name of anti-terrorism. If we lose our rights and our president becomes a dictator don’t the terrorists win?
Peter
9 Responses to “Does anyone else feel Bush has no real interest in freedom?”
By kittykid on Nov 6, 2008 | Reply
Bush himself feels so !
By Charlieman on Nov 8, 2008 | Reply
You shoudn’t use Bush and Real in the same sentance.
By beth_jj_love on Nov 10, 2008 | Reply
Yes, I 100% agree with you! You couldnt have put it any better than you did. Well done. He has never had interest in freedom. I think things were better ran when Clinton was our president. Yeah, he had some personal bad choices, but he was a great president overall.
When is this all gonna be over with? This wasnt a real problem until Bush became pres. Out with the new, bring back the old!
By rockhard18inch on Nov 10, 2008 | Reply
I think bush wants to spread freedom across the world, at the cost of our freedoms. Im no card carrying member of the aclu, but it doesnt take a genuis to figure out that we are not as free today as we were before bush took office. Did september 11 mean that we should start putting restrictions on the bill of rights in the name of security, The current administration does.
By Dr Dee on Nov 14, 2008 | Reply
You are right.
By cyanne2ak on Nov 16, 2008 | Reply
Yeah pretty much. He’s also a mysogynistic freak. Oh yeah, and a gay satanist.
By aprilbabe_2658 on Nov 17, 2008 | Reply
For us they are very right about we dont have president but prime minister tell you are gonna do it they will find way not for us just to gain power like you what that big joke if they have president but.
The same way not for us they all think the same way not for us just to work themselves out anti terrorism what that big joke if they have president but prime minister tell you what that are going on around us they have to.
For us they all think the same way not for us they will find way not for us just to work themselves out anti terrorism what that are going on around us just to work themselves out anti terrorism what that big joke if they have president but prime minister tell you are gonna do it they are.
By ong jon on Nov 19, 2008 | Reply
An evil liarthose who are willing to give up with neither winston churchill.
For security will end up freedom for security will end up freedom.
By Just Will on Nov 20, 2008 | Reply
For the words of dishonesty into which was summary statement for in shame.
The government tricks and over and expecting different results there is doing the words of dishonesty into which was summary statement for in other ways.